Skip to main content

USA: Guns



I was reading Canada's Maclean's magazine this morning, with a lead article on the Arizona shooting.  Some of the numbers are amazing (and shocking).  

With all the political rhetoric leading up to, and culminating in, the Giffords shooting, one thing is clear:  If the Palin targeting campaign did not have any impact on the shooting, it easily could have.  And therefore, something needs to change.  However, I suspect that the "dialog" resulting from this will result in even more divisive politics, instead of any positive change :-/
  • 1.30 million US citizens have been killed by firearms in the last 40 years, or over 32K per year.
  • 0.58 million US troops have been killed in action since 1776, or about 2.5K per year
  • 283M guns are currently in civilian hands
  • The annual death rate from firearms is about 10 per 100,000
  • The annual death rate from motor vehicle accidents is about 15 per 100,000
Here is some data for other "democratic" countries:
---------------
 Gun deaths per 100,000 population (for the year indicated): 
  Homicide Suicide Other (inc Accident)
       
USA (2001)       3.98  5.92 0.36
Italy (1997)  0.81 1.1 0.07
Switzerland (1998) 0.50  5.8    0.10
Canada (2002) 0.4 2.0 0.04
Finland (2003) 0.35 4.45 0.10
Australia (2001) 0.24 1.34 0.10
France (2001) 0.21 3.4 0.49
England/Wales (2002) 0.15 0.2 0.03
Scotland (2002) 0.06 0.2 0.02
Japan (2002) 0.02 0.04 0        


----------------

The map below is from: http://wisqars.cdc.gov:8080/cdcMapFramework/mapModuleInterface.jsp
(Choose "firearms" only to get this view).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Centre Cannot Hold

Some thoughts on decentralization .  With all of the blockchain and Ethereum news, along with the dramatic uptick of ICO's, it is worth building a framework for decentralization.  The linked post makes a start on that.
Read more

Acsoi - Land Grab Economics

"Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income" ( Acsoi ), is a measure of what a companies profits would be if they were not spending like crazy to acquire a space:  in GroupOn's case, this would be retailers. To me, using Acsoi as a measure is really an admission that a company has no staying power beyond brand awareness.  So, they need to grab and own as much mindshare as they can, as quickly as they can, to increase the barrier to entry for competitors.  Without intellectual property to help protect them, and with the cost of switching (for a user) being effectively zero, building a global brand, and relying on brand stickiness, is the best way forward. Companies like Amazon that have been effective at this have also built in other "sticky" factors over time: recommendation engines, one-click purchasing, etc.  This increases the cost for the user to switch, and allows the company to stop pouring money into marketing and acquisition costs.  You also buil
Post a Comment
Read more

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].
Post a Comment
Read more