Skip to main content

USA: Guns



I was reading Canada's Maclean's magazine this morning, with a lead article on the Arizona shooting.  Some of the numbers are amazing (and shocking).  

With all the political rhetoric leading up to, and culminating in, the Giffords shooting, one thing is clear:  If the Palin targeting campaign did not have any impact on the shooting, it easily could have.  And therefore, something needs to change.  However, I suspect that the "dialog" resulting from this will result in even more divisive politics, instead of any positive change :-/
  • 1.30 million US citizens have been killed by firearms in the last 40 years, or over 32K per year.
  • 0.58 million US troops have been killed in action since 1776, or about 2.5K per year
  • 283M guns are currently in civilian hands
  • The annual death rate from firearms is about 10 per 100,000
  • The annual death rate from motor vehicle accidents is about 15 per 100,000
Here is some data for other "democratic" countries:
---------------
 Gun deaths per 100,000 population (for the year indicated): 
  Homicide Suicide Other (inc Accident)
       
USA (2001)       3.98  5.92 0.36
Italy (1997)  0.81 1.1 0.07
Switzerland (1998) 0.50  5.8    0.10
Canada (2002) 0.4 2.0 0.04
Finland (2003) 0.35 4.45 0.10
Australia (2001) 0.24 1.34 0.10
France (2001) 0.21 3.4 0.49
England/Wales (2002) 0.15 0.2 0.03
Scotland (2002) 0.06 0.2 0.02
Japan (2002) 0.02 0.04 0        


----------------

The map below is from: http://wisqars.cdc.gov:8080/cdcMapFramework/mapModuleInterface.jsp
(Choose "firearms" only to get this view).



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Timed math tests

You have 3.2 seconds to figure out the problem below. Alan knows 90% of the concepts behind the math test, and can do those 90% very quickly.  He always gets 90% on timed math tests. Bob knows 100% of the concepts, but is a slow worker.  In the timed math test, he gets 75%, but, if given an extra 10 minutes, would get 100%. Alan graduates with an A; Bob with a C. You are building a bridge. Who would you hire? Seems like everyone from Gates to Zuckerberg has problems with how education is carried out today.  I wish I had some of their clout and could help to change the system.
Post a Comment
Read more

FTC should look at the Republicrats

It strikes me that the Republicrats (the Democrats and the Republicans) form an unfair monopoly.  While antitrust law is typically associated with corporations, it could, conceivably also be applied to government (the FTC is an independent government body). Triggering the antitrust laws typically means that you have a monopoly (hard to argue against that for the Republicrats) and that you abuse that position.  It has become abundantly clear over the last year that both parties are abusing their positions by focusing all of their energies on "win at any cost" as opposed to "do something for the country."  This is also why they can be considered a single entity (for the purposes of a monopoly)...they are not really two parties; just one inward facing machine. Unfortunately, it appears that there will not be any real third party, yet again, in the next election....so there is no motivation for either party to change their behavior.   It also appears that you ...
Post a Comment
Read more