Skip to main content

First week at Mozilla: Identity

So, it is my first week at Mozilla Labs; I picked a great first week - the launch of Firefox 4 for both desktop and mobile.

 One of the big topics for Mozilla is Identity and Privacy.  After all, "Firefox answers to no one but you."   However, digging into identity (above the layer of authentication and authorization) is a tricky business.

This book is a very interesting framework in which to think of identity.  It is intuitive social science: we all have expectations about how our personal information should be used, based on the context of use; when our expectations are not met, we react poorly; when our expectations are stressed, but not broken, expectations may evolve, especially to encapsulate new technologies.

Contextual Integrity is the catch phrase to encompass this idea...and the idea that identity/Privacy is not about hiding your information, but about its appropriate use.

The difficulty is turning a social science into a computer science.  There has been lots of follow on work on Contextual Integrity, using temporal and other logics.  They give the foundations for how to implement a system, but really it is the system inputs which are problematic. The biggest issue, of course, is establishing context.  It is well known that users will not take the time to define contexts, so we need to derive context from activity: browsing, communication, location, etc.

In many ways the browser is the right place to establish context (for your online identity), so I am optimistic that Mozilla can bring (at least parts of) this to life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Timed math tests

You have 3.2 seconds to figure out the problem below. Alan knows 90% of the concepts behind the math test, and can do those 90% very quickly.  He always gets 90% on timed math tests. Bob knows 100% of the concepts, but is a slow worker.  In the timed math test, he gets 75%, but, if given an extra 10 minutes, would get 100%. Alan graduates with an A; Bob with a C. You are building a bridge. Who would you hire? Seems like everyone from Gates to Zuckerberg has problems with how education is carried out today.  I wish I had some of their clout and could help to change the system.

FTC should look at the Republicrats

It strikes me that the Republicrats (the Democrats and the Republicans) form an unfair monopoly.  While antitrust law is typically associated with corporations, it could, conceivably also be applied to government (the FTC is an independent government body). Triggering the antitrust laws typically means that you have a monopoly (hard to argue against that for the Republicrats) and that you abuse that position.  It has become abundantly clear over the last year that both parties are abusing their positions by focusing all of their energies on "win at any cost" as opposed to "do something for the country."  This is also why they can be considered a single entity (for the purposes of a monopoly)...they are not really two parties; just one inward facing machine. Unfortunately, it appears that there will not be any real third party, yet again, in the next election....so there is no motivation for either party to change their behavior.   It also appears that you ...