Skip to main content

Sharks vs Vancouver

It is gut-check time.

Do I cheer for San Jose or Vancouver?

I have two conflicting logic trees:

I am Canadian
Vancouver is in Canada
Therefore, I should support Vancouver

San Jose has 22 Canadians on their Roster
Vancouver has 16 Canadians on their Roster
I am Canadian
Therefore, I should support San Jose

So, I have turned to "How We Decide" which I just recently read to see if it has any answers.

Jonah Lehrer would suggest that I check two aspects.  My emotional brain, and my rational brain.

My emotional brain screams "Vancouver"; obviously there is a stronger emotional link between location (Canada) than roster.

My rational brain says "San Jose".  In the last three years, I have never watched a Canucks game, or followed the team very closely.  However, I have been to many Sharks games, enjoy watching there progress, and even listen to quite a few games on the radio.

Lehrer suggests that typically your rational brain is the one to follow.

I also love an underdog.  Conclusion: "Go Sharks."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Timed math tests

You have 3.2 seconds to figure out the problem below. Alan knows 90% of the concepts behind the math test, and can do those 90% very quickly.  He always gets 90% on timed math tests. Bob knows 100% of the concepts, but is a slow worker.  In the timed math test, he gets 75%, but, if given an extra 10 minutes, would get 100%. Alan graduates with an A; Bob with a C. You are building a bridge. Who would you hire? Seems like everyone from Gates to Zuckerberg has problems with how education is carried out today.  I wish I had some of their clout and could help to change the system.
Post a Comment
Read more

FTC should look at the Republicrats

It strikes me that the Republicrats (the Democrats and the Republicans) form an unfair monopoly.  While antitrust law is typically associated with corporations, it could, conceivably also be applied to government (the FTC is an independent government body). Triggering the antitrust laws typically means that you have a monopoly (hard to argue against that for the Republicrats) and that you abuse that position.  It has become abundantly clear over the last year that both parties are abusing their positions by focusing all of their energies on "win at any cost" as opposed to "do something for the country."  This is also why they can be considered a single entity (for the purposes of a monopoly)...they are not really two parties; just one inward facing machine. Unfortunately, it appears that there will not be any real third party, yet again, in the next election....so there is no motivation for either party to change their behavior.   It also appears that you ...
Post a Comment
Read more