Skip to main content

Women who stare at parking spots


Listening to the playground antics of the US government around the debt ceiling is very painful.  I still expect there will be a "last minute deal," but I also hope that the pathetic posturing that is bringing the US to the brink causes people to rethink the process.

On NPR this morning there were two interesting comments on the underlying psychology that is aiding and abetting the current process.

  1. Short term considerations overwhelmingly override long term ones.  The example was that if I ask you to give up an ice-cream cone next year, it is easy to say "yes".  If I swing by right now with the desert tray, you will have a hard time saying "no".  The debate around the debt ceiling is really about long-term concerns....but the (somewhat artificial) deadline of August 2nd is making it into a negotiation about the short term.
  2. Men are hyper-competitive without women present to moderate things.  Maybe not too surprising, but it leads to men acting in non-intuitive ways; I missed the exact reference on NPR, but there was an example of two cities in Eastern Europe which were quite similar except that one has a very high ratio of women on city counsel, and one has a high ratio of men.  The one with the women at the helm runs like a finely tuned machine, whereas the other is full of posturing, last-minute (and bad) decisions, higher debt, etc.
So, the lesson is pretty clear.
  1. Change the incentives for law makers from long-term abstract (the debt) to short-term concrete.  Either stop paying them, or even more severe, take away their preferred parking spots.  Of the two, the psychologist was sure that the parking spot would have the most impact.  Most law makers would have savings, so removing their pay is still a mid-to-long term play.  Losing your parking spot - tomorrow - is an immediate incentive.
  2. Get more women involved.  It is hard to imagine changing the ratio of law makers quickly, but it is easy to imagine moving the negotiating arena to a venue where more women are present.  Force every law maker to bring a female counerpart, for example.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fourth R.

Reading, wRiting, aRithmetic, and algoRithms.  My wife and I were just brainstorming about this: how coding should be the next "basic" skill.  Of course, someone was ahead of us and posted this .  It is awesome to see Mozilla Hackasaurus referenced in this article.  It is a small world. In the early days of the printing press, scholars wrote the books; the press was simply used for production (see this article ).  As time went on, "average" people became familiar with the medium, and used it for their own messages.  We are at just that point with the Web.  Software Engineers write the code, and the Web distributes it.   Software Engineers are the algoRithm scholars of today.  They won't be for long.  Soon algoRithms will be taught starting in elementary school, along with the other three R's.
Read more

Connectome as a Book

Your Connectome is a map of your brain.  Every neuron, every synapse. I am only a few pages into Connectome, but was intrigued by a sentence: "Human DNA....has three billion letters....would be a million pages long if printed as a book."  The companion question, "How many pages for the Connectome?" might be answered later in the book, but I thought I would take a shot at it here. Here is the punchline: Your Connectome book is 6.7 million times longer than your DNA book. That human DNA is about a million pages is not too surprising, although it probably is not optimized. According to quora there are between 1500 and 1800 letters per page.  I am going to use round numbers, namely 2000.  Then, the 3x10^9 DNA letters would actually be 1.5 million pages.  But this is very wasteful.  Even using just ASCII we can encode four DNA letters per character, so the book should really only be about 400K pages.  And, this book is much more interesting; in...
Post a Comment
Read more