Skip to main content

Ivy League

It was interesting, although not a surprise, to read that some Chinese students fake their applications in order to get into USA Universities.  I expect that the second half of this story is that many Universities turn a blind eye to the practice (or, to be fair, don't have strong ways to identify cheaters) because foreign students pay premiums to attend, and this makes up an increasing amount of University revenue.  The following was reported in September:

California has reduced funding for the university system by $650 million this year .....most dramatic shifts have taken place at some of the UC system’s more popular campuses, such as UC-Berkeley, where out-of-state residents and international students make up 30 percent of this year’s freshman class, up from 23 percent last year.


The negatives (beyond the moral aspects of cheating) are:
1) The overall quality of students decreases, as a higher percentage of unqualified students are accepted.
2) The education level in the US decreases, as some qualified students do not get accepted at top schools.

I don't actually believe (1) as I don't believe the SAT / AP / GPA tests accurately reflect potential.  In fact, being creative enough to cheat well to get into school may imply a better aptitude.  In which case, I am wrong about (2) as well.

The positives are:
1)  The US is still seen as a preeminent location to get an education
2)  The Universities are fostering multiculturalism

I thought that I would find that spending on education, as a percent of GDP, had decreased over the last fifty years, but that is actually not the case (of course, this is overall spending, but I imagine the University portion of this has also grown proportionally).

So, one (not so scientific) conclusion is that the education system has become inefficient.  They have the same, or more, funding than 50 years ago, but are resorting to artificially pushing foreign student ratios to cover expenses.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fourth R.

Reading, wRiting, aRithmetic, and algoRithms.  My wife and I were just brainstorming about this: how coding should be the next "basic" skill.  Of course, someone was ahead of us and posted this .  It is awesome to see Mozilla Hackasaurus referenced in this article.  It is a small world. In the early days of the printing press, scholars wrote the books; the press was simply used for production (see this article ).  As time went on, "average" people became familiar with the medium, and used it for their own messages.  We are at just that point with the Web.  Software Engineers write the code, and the Web distributes it.   Software Engineers are the algoRithm scholars of today.  They won't be for long.  Soon algoRithms will be taught starting in elementary school, along with the other three R's.
Read more

Connectome as a Book

Your Connectome is a map of your brain.  Every neuron, every synapse. I am only a few pages into Connectome, but was intrigued by a sentence: "Human DNA....has three billion letters....would be a million pages long if printed as a book."  The companion question, "How many pages for the Connectome?" might be answered later in the book, but I thought I would take a shot at it here. Here is the punchline: Your Connectome book is 6.7 million times longer than your DNA book. That human DNA is about a million pages is not too surprising, although it probably is not optimized. According to quora there are between 1500 and 1800 letters per page.  I am going to use round numbers, namely 2000.  Then, the 3x10^9 DNA letters would actually be 1.5 million pages.  But this is very wasteful.  Even using just ASCII we can encode four DNA letters per character, so the book should really only be about 400K pages.  And, this book is much more interesting; in...
Post a Comment
Read more