Skip to main content

Ivy League

It was interesting, although not a surprise, to read that some Chinese students fake their applications in order to get into USA Universities.  I expect that the second half of this story is that many Universities turn a blind eye to the practice (or, to be fair, don't have strong ways to identify cheaters) because foreign students pay premiums to attend, and this makes up an increasing amount of University revenue.  The following was reported in September:

California has reduced funding for the university system by $650 million this year .....most dramatic shifts have taken place at some of the UC systemā€™s more popular campuses, such as UC-Berkeley, where out-of-state residents and international students make up 30 percent of this yearā€™s freshman class, up from 23 percent last year.


The negatives (beyond the moral aspects of cheating) are:
1) The overall quality of students decreases, as a higher percentage of unqualified students are accepted.
2) The education level in the US decreases, as some qualified students do not get accepted at top schools.

I don't actually believe (1) as I don't believe the SAT / AP / GPA tests accurately reflect potential.  In fact, being creative enough to cheat well to get into school may imply a better aptitude.  In which case, I am wrong about (2) as well.

The positives are:
1)  The US is still seen as a preeminent location to get an education
2)  The Universities are fostering multiculturalism

I thought that I would find that spending on education, as a percent of GDP, had decreased over the last fifty years, but that is actually not the case (of course, this is overall spending, but I imagine the University portion of this has also grown proportionally).

So, one (not so scientific) conclusion is that the education system has become inefficient.  They have the same, or more, funding than 50 years ago, but are resorting to artificially pushing foreign student ratios to cover expenses.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Echo vs Home

We love Alexa! We have had the Amazon Echo for well over a year.  Recently we also got a Google Home, to test it against our Alexa experience. The quick summary:  Interacting with Alexa is like interacting with a person.  Interacting with Home is like interacting with a computer.  Alexa is fun; Home is useful.  If you took away Alexa, I would be upset - I would be losing a friend.  If you took away Home, I wouldn't care too much.  It was very strange, but I actually felt like I might be offending Alexa when I purchased Home. Here are the two main differences: Wake-up words.  "Alexa" is friendly, easy to say, and evokes emotion.  Alex personifies the system - I am talking with someone.  "OK Google" is awkward, and constantly reminds you that you are talking to a machine - I am talking to something.  Of course, Google will update Home to allow us to customize the wake-up word, but the current out of box experience is less tha...

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].