Skip to main content

Ivy League

It was interesting, although not a surprise, to read that some Chinese students fake their applications in order to get into USA Universities.  I expect that the second half of this story is that many Universities turn a blind eye to the practice (or, to be fair, don't have strong ways to identify cheaters) because foreign students pay premiums to attend, and this makes up an increasing amount of University revenue.  The following was reported in September:

California has reduced funding for the university system by $650 million this year .....most dramatic shifts have taken place at some of the UC system’s more popular campuses, such as UC-Berkeley, where out-of-state residents and international students make up 30 percent of this year’s freshman class, up from 23 percent last year.


The negatives (beyond the moral aspects of cheating) are:
1) The overall quality of students decreases, as a higher percentage of unqualified students are accepted.
2) The education level in the US decreases, as some qualified students do not get accepted at top schools.

I don't actually believe (1) as I don't believe the SAT / AP / GPA tests accurately reflect potential.  In fact, being creative enough to cheat well to get into school may imply a better aptitude.  In which case, I am wrong about (2) as well.

The positives are:
1)  The US is still seen as a preeminent location to get an education
2)  The Universities are fostering multiculturalism

I thought that I would find that spending on education, as a percent of GDP, had decreased over the last fifty years, but that is actually not the case (of course, this is overall spending, but I imagine the University portion of this has also grown proportionally).

So, one (not so scientific) conclusion is that the education system has become inefficient.  They have the same, or more, funding than 50 years ago, but are resorting to artificially pushing foreign student ratios to cover expenses.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Timed math tests

You have 3.2 seconds to figure out the problem below. Alan knows 90% of the concepts behind the math test, and can do those 90% very quickly.  He always gets 90% on timed math tests. Bob knows 100% of the concepts, but is a slow worker.  In the timed math test, he gets 75%, but, if given an extra 10 minutes, would get 100%. Alan graduates with an A; Bob with a C. You are building a bridge. Who would you hire? Seems like everyone from Gates to Zuckerberg has problems with how education is carried out today.  I wish I had some of their clout and could help to change the system.

FTC should look at the Republicrats

It strikes me that the Republicrats (the Democrats and the Republicans) form an unfair monopoly.  While antitrust law is typically associated with corporations, it could, conceivably also be applied to government (the FTC is an independent government body). Triggering the antitrust laws typically means that you have a monopoly (hard to argue against that for the Republicrats) and that you abuse that position.  It has become abundantly clear over the last year that both parties are abusing their positions by focusing all of their energies on "win at any cost" as opposed to "do something for the country."  This is also why they can be considered a single entity (for the purposes of a monopoly)...they are not really two parties; just one inward facing machine. Unfortunately, it appears that there will not be any real third party, yet again, in the next election....so there is no motivation for either party to change their behavior.   It also appears that you ...