Skip to main content

Fixing the Game

There is a great summary article in Forbes of this book by Roger Martin.  Having run a public company for several years, the thesis here resonated with me immediately.  Executives spend way too much time managing the Expectations Market (i.e., the stock market) as opposed to building value in the Real Market (i.e., goods and services used by your customers).  And, because the Expectations Market exists, hedge funds and activist investors have a platform.  To change the focus back to the Real Market, Martin has several suggestions, including:

  • Repeal safe harbor, thus eliminating earnings guidance and forward speculation.
  • Eliminate stock-based compensation.
  • Regulate hedge funds.

I have had a related theory for a long time:  that the tax system is unfairly structured to favor the Expectation Market.  You pay lower taxes on Expectations Market gains (capital gains) than you do on Real Market gains (gains tied closely to the production of Real goods).  The further a financial instrument gets from the Real Market, the higher the taxes on it should be.  Hedge fund gains, or credit default swaps, should be taxed at a higher rate than income tax.  Of course, money is the lubricant for the Real Market, so we would have to ensure that direct investments that are "close to the Real" still had a tax advantage.  However, by increasing taxes based on the "derivative level" of an instrument, we would encourage people to spend more time in the Real world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Centre Cannot Hold

Some thoughts on decentralization .  With all of the blockchain and Ethereum news, along with the dramatic uptick of ICO's, it is worth building a framework for decentralization.  The linked post makes a start on that.
Read more

Acsoi - Land Grab Economics

"Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income" ( Acsoi ), is a measure of what a companies profits would be if they were not spending like crazy to acquire a space:  in GroupOn's case, this would be retailers. To me, using Acsoi as a measure is really an admission that a company has no staying power beyond brand awareness.  So, they need to grab and own as much mindshare as they can, as quickly as they can, to increase the barrier to entry for competitors.  Without intellectual property to help protect them, and with the cost of switching (for a user) being effectively zero, building a global brand, and relying on brand stickiness, is the best way forward. Companies like Amazon that have been effective at this have also built in other "sticky" factors over time: recommendation engines, one-click purchasing, etc.  This increases the cost for the user to switch, and allows the company to stop pouring money into marketing and acquisition costs.  You also buil
Post a Comment
Read more

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].
Post a Comment
Read more