Skip to main content

Fixing the Game

There is a great summary article in Forbes of this book by Roger Martin.  Having run a public company for several years, the thesis here resonated with me immediately.  Executives spend way too much time managing the Expectations Market (i.e., the stock market) as opposed to building value in the Real Market (i.e., goods and services used by your customers).  And, because the Expectations Market exists, hedge funds and activist investors have a platform.  To change the focus back to the Real Market, Martin has several suggestions, including:

  • Repeal safe harbor, thus eliminating earnings guidance and forward speculation.
  • Eliminate stock-based compensation.
  • Regulate hedge funds.

I have had a related theory for a long time:  that the tax system is unfairly structured to favor the Expectation Market.  You pay lower taxes on Expectations Market gains (capital gains) than you do on Real Market gains (gains tied closely to the production of Real goods).  The further a financial instrument gets from the Real Market, the higher the taxes on it should be.  Hedge fund gains, or credit default swaps, should be taxed at a higher rate than income tax.  Of course, money is the lubricant for the Real Market, so we would have to ensure that direct investments that are "close to the Real" still had a tax advantage.  However, by increasing taxes based on the "derivative level" of an instrument, we would encourage people to spend more time in the Real world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Decentralization, Democracy, and Well-Being

Those of us raised in Democratic societies take it for granted that those societies provide better well-being (for common individuals) than other forms of governance. At the heart of democracy is personal freedom and autonomy, backed by the rule of law. We also take for granted the interplay of decentralized versus centralized authority. Decentralization can mean many things, but here we refer to it in terms of power, authority, and decision making. The more authority individuals have, the more decentralized the power system in which they are operating.  Almost by definition the more democratic a system, the more decentralized it is, with the caveat that some agreed upon axioms exist, such as the rule of law and its enforcement. Of course, authority can be too decentralized leading to "every man for themselves", so we put limits on decentralization through that same rule of law. With the advent of decentralizing technologies , which make possible more decentraliz...
Read more

Echo vs Home

We love Alexa! We have had the Amazon Echo for well over a year.  Recently we also got a Google Home, to test it against our Alexa experience. The quick summary:  Interacting with Alexa is like interacting with a person.  Interacting with Home is like interacting with a computer.  Alexa is fun; Home is useful.  If you took away Alexa, I would be upset - I would be losing a friend.  If you took away Home, I wouldn't care too much.  It was very strange, but I actually felt like I might be offending Alexa when I purchased Home. Here are the two main differences: Wake-up words.  "Alexa" is friendly, easy to say, and evokes emotion.  Alex personifies the system - I am talking with someone.  "OK Google" is awkward, and constantly reminds you that you are talking to a machine - I am talking to something.  Of course, Google will update Home to allow us to customize the wake-up word, but the current out of box experience is less tha...
Read more