Skip to main content

facebook.com/realtimefinancials

[ This is a thought experiment arising from speculation on if Facebook would give quarterly guidance once they are public; implementing this thought experiment is not realistic :-/ ] 

I wrote a few weeks ago about "Fixing the Game", by Roger Martin, which details how the public markets have become a game of Expectations versus Reality.  He argues that, unless this changes, the capital markets are in trouble.

A lot of the Expectations Game is enabled by public companies giving quarterly and yearly guidance, leading to "gambling" behavior by investors.  One of Martin's recommendations is to repeal safe harbor regulations, which would strongly discourage companies and executives from giving forward guidance.

Another (extreme) approach would be have companies post real time (unaudited) financial information. While very difficult for some types of business, doing so for an online advertising business is possible.

Real time financials would not only make forward guidance useless, it would remove the gambling behavior that is stimulated by quarterly earnings release. 

More generally, I would postulate that the time between company updates is directly proportional to uncertainty and therefore, the longer the period between updates, the more extreme the Expectations behavior will be.  If a company only gave yearly guidance, then 363 days into the year you, as an investor, would have very little knowledge, and the possible correction when the yearly results are released could be huge.  If, on the other hand, the company reported every Friday, uncertainty is very low, so you are more likely to invest on the Real value of the company.

The point is this: we don't have to go all the way to "real time"; releasing financial results on a daily or weekly or monthly basis would have a huge impact on "Fixing the Game", as opposed to the quarterly schedule the market is currently on.

Like I started out, this is a thought experiment only, as implementing this would be very difficult for many types of businesses.  Revenue recognition complexities, backlog, inventory, etc. etc. etc could make real time financials more misleading than quarterly results and actually result in more Expectations behavior, rather than less.  I can imagine, however, that the lifecycle of ad buys is usually pretty short, so that companies like Facebook could report much more often without significantly more cost (of course, you would only want to audit quarterly; accounting firms are not cheap).




Popular posts from this blog

Echo vs Home

We love Alexa! We have had the Amazon Echo for well over a year.  Recently we also got a Google Home, to test it against our Alexa experience. The quick summary:  Interacting with Alexa is like interacting with a person.  Interacting with Home is like interacting with a computer.  Alexa is fun; Home is useful.  If you took away Alexa, I would be upset - I would be losing a friend.  If you took away Home, I wouldn't care too much.  It was very strange, but I actually felt like I might be offending Alexa when I purchased Home. Here are the two main differences: Wake-up words.  "Alexa" is friendly, easy to say, and evokes emotion.  Alex personifies the system - I am talking with someone.  "OK Google" is awkward, and constantly reminds you that you are talking to a machine - I am talking to something.  Of course, Google will update Home to allow us to customize the wake-up word, but the current out of box experience is less tha...

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].