Skip to main content

facebook.com/realtimefinancials

[ This is a thought experiment arising from speculation on if Facebook would give quarterly guidance once they are public; implementing this thought experiment is not realistic :-/ ] 

I wrote a few weeks ago about "Fixing the Game", by Roger Martin, which details how the public markets have become a game of Expectations versus Reality.  He argues that, unless this changes, the capital markets are in trouble.

A lot of the Expectations Game is enabled by public companies giving quarterly and yearly guidance, leading to "gambling" behavior by investors.  One of Martin's recommendations is to repeal safe harbor regulations, which would strongly discourage companies and executives from giving forward guidance.

Another (extreme) approach would be have companies post real time (unaudited) financial information. While very difficult for some types of business, doing so for an online advertising business is possible.

Real time financials would not only make forward guidance useless, it would remove the gambling behavior that is stimulated by quarterly earnings release. 

More generally, I would postulate that the time between company updates is directly proportional to uncertainty and therefore, the longer the period between updates, the more extreme the Expectations behavior will be.  If a company only gave yearly guidance, then 363 days into the year you, as an investor, would have very little knowledge, and the possible correction when the yearly results are released could be huge.  If, on the other hand, the company reported every Friday, uncertainty is very low, so you are more likely to invest on the Real value of the company.

The point is this: we don't have to go all the way to "real time"; releasing financial results on a daily or weekly or monthly basis would have a huge impact on "Fixing the Game", as opposed to the quarterly schedule the market is currently on.

Like I started out, this is a thought experiment only, as implementing this would be very difficult for many types of businesses.  Revenue recognition complexities, backlog, inventory, etc. etc. etc could make real time financials more misleading than quarterly results and actually result in more Expectations behavior, rather than less.  I can imagine, however, that the lifecycle of ad buys is usually pretty short, so that companies like Facebook could report much more often without significantly more cost (of course, you would only want to audit quarterly; accounting firms are not cheap).




Popular posts from this blog

The Centre Cannot Hold

Some thoughts on decentralization .  With all of the blockchain and Ethereum news, along with the dramatic uptick of ICO's, it is worth building a framework for decentralization.  The linked post makes a start on that.

Acsoi - Land Grab Economics

"Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income" ( Acsoi ), is a measure of what a companies profits would be if they were not spending like crazy to acquire a space:  in GroupOn's case, this would be retailers. To me, using Acsoi as a measure is really an admission that a company has no staying power beyond brand awareness.  So, they need to grab and own as much mindshare as they can, as quickly as they can, to increase the barrier to entry for competitors.  Without intellectual property to help protect them, and with the cost of switching (for a user) being effectively zero, building a global brand, and relying on brand stickiness, is the best way forward. Companies like Amazon that have been effective at this have also built in other "sticky" factors over time: recommendation engines, one-click purchasing, etc.  This increases the cost for the user to switch, and allows the company to stop pouring money into marketing and acquisition costs.  You also buil

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].