Skip to main content

Software eats the Government

Andreessen Horowitz are well known for the theory that "software will eat the world."  I am a big believer in this.  I was recently asked to speak at the Banff Forum, a Canadian think-tank, and talked about this, combined with how "open development" alongside software would challenge everything we do over the next twenty-five to fifty years.  It is fairly easy to point to software eating the world with books (Amazon), travel (Expedia and others), trading, etc.  It was a little bit harder for me to find great examples about how software will eat government, beyond the standard open.gov data initiatives.

Thus, I was quite intrigued with Clay Shirky's TED talk about how git, the software version control system, could apply to law and the democratic process.  In Clay's words, it is a new form of arguing, that is compatible with the democratic process.


(Nice to Mozilla in the top seven links on the site :-)   Git's distributed content management is now being used to manage things other than software.  Git is distributed, collaborative, but also controlled.  Whether git will eat government is yet to be determined, but it is a great example of how this could happen.

Popular posts from this blog

Timed math tests

You have 3.2 seconds to figure out the problem below. Alan knows 90% of the concepts behind the math test, and can do those 90% very quickly.  He always gets 90% on timed math tests. Bob knows 100% of the concepts, but is a slow worker.  In the timed math test, he gets 75%, but, if given an extra 10 minutes, would get 100%. Alan graduates with an A; Bob with a C. You are building a bridge. Who would you hire? Seems like everyone from Gates to Zuckerberg has problems with how education is carried out today.  I wish I had some of their clout and could help to change the system.

Decentralization, Democracy, and Well-Being

Those of us raised in Democratic societies take it for granted that those societies provide better well-being (for common individuals) than other forms of governance. At the heart of democracy is personal freedom and autonomy, backed by the rule of law. We also take for granted the interplay of decentralized versus centralized authority. Decentralization can mean many things, but here we refer to it in terms of power, authority, and decision making. The more authority individuals have, the more decentralized the power system in which they are operating.  Almost by definition the more democratic a system, the more decentralized it is, with the caveat that some agreed upon axioms exist, such as the rule of law and its enforcement. Of course, authority can be too decentralized leading to "every man for themselves", so we put limits on decentralization through that same rule of law. With the advent of decentralizing technologies , which make possible more decentraliz...