Skip to main content

No More Rails

There was a good segment on NPR yesterday on how self driving cars will reinvent parking lots.  Speculators should be buying city center parking lots now, as they will become very valuable real estate soon.  Two things strike me, in general, about the self driving car discussions:

  1. We have still not internalized that advances in the software are exponential, not linear.  With new cars being closer to "software with wheels" and the ability to download updates on demand, that exponential progress will now become apparent.  Of course, regulators will be slower, but I feel like the 10-15 years before adoption is pessimistic.
  2. Perhaps more interestingly, where is the discussion of self driving public transit?  And, in particular light-rail systems and/or subways.
What if we used a bit of imagination, and thought about the combination of self driving technology and no more rails?  Think about how restrictive, and expensive, rails are.  What purpose do they serve in a modern city?  
  • Light rail transit cars, with wheels, could be routed to where they are needed (of course, many light rail systems are electric...so the cars need to have enough battery to go "off grid" when necessary).  Cross-over tracks?  What a quaint idea.  Huge re-engineering efforts to route trains to a new area?  How about just updating the software?
  • Automated city buses could use the same right of ways as light rail.  Some cities do this already, but many have duplicate infrastructure.
  • Then, automated cars could use the same right of ways, and tuck in behind the trains.  (In a related idea, what if HOV lanes where switched over to support automated cars only?)
  • Then, ultimately, we don't need the trains at all.  Convoys of self-driving cars, available on demand, will arrange themselves into trains, and make effective use of the right of ways.  The NPR segment referenced that 30% of Uber rides in San Francisco begin or end at train stops.  It would be naive to assume that should drive more investment in light rail.
This seems like a straightforward vision.  Yet, cities are continuing to invest huge amounts in laying down rails.  Stranded investment.


Popular posts from this blog

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].
Post a Comment
Read more

Acsoi - Land Grab Economics

"Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income" ( Acsoi ), is a measure of what a companies profits would be if they were not spending like crazy to acquire a space:  in GroupOn's case, this would be retailers. To me, using Acsoi as a measure is really an admission that a company has no staying power beyond brand awareness.  So, they need to grab and own as much mindshare as they can, as quickly as they can, to increase the barrier to entry for competitors.  Without intellectual property to help protect them, and with the cost of switching (for a user) being effectively zero, building a global brand, and relying on brand stickiness, is the best way forward. Companies like Amazon that have been effective at this have also built in other "sticky" factors over time: recommendation engines, one-click purchasing, etc.  This increases the cost for the user to switch, and allows the company to stop pouring money into marketing and acquisition costs.  You also buil...
Post a Comment
Read more

Schrodinger's Cat is still Alive...and Dead

With Borders scaling back so many of their stores, I have ended up buying more books than I normally would. One I picked up is "What is Life?" by Ed Regis.  It is a good short read, although it is now 2 years old, which is a long time given the rate that "artificial life" is moving at.  Since the book came out, Craig Ventor claims to have created the first artificial life . One thing I did not know was that Schrodinger wrote a book with the same title in 1944 which predicted the existence of a DNA-like molecule;  Crick actually credits Schrodinger with inspiring some of his early work. Ed Regis points out that Schrodinger's book never actually defines what life is; that is left hanging.  Interestingly, I felt the same about Regis's book.  While he argues that life is defined by having an "embedded metabolism" that argument still seems weak.  Carl Sagan pointed out, many years ago, that cars have a metabolism, which is hard to argue against....
Post a Comment
Read more