Skip to main content

No More Rails

There was a good segment on NPR yesterday on how self driving cars will reinvent parking lots.  Speculators should be buying city center parking lots now, as they will become very valuable real estate soon.  Two things strike me, in general, about the self driving car discussions:

  1. We have still not internalized that advances in the software are exponential, not linear.  With new cars being closer to "software with wheels" and the ability to download updates on demand, that exponential progress will now become apparent.  Of course, regulators will be slower, but I feel like the 10-15 years before adoption is pessimistic.
  2. Perhaps more interestingly, where is the discussion of self driving public transit?  And, in particular light-rail systems and/or subways.
What if we used a bit of imagination, and thought about the combination of self driving technology and no more rails?  Think about how restrictive, and expensive, rails are.  What purpose do they serve in a modern city?  
  • Light rail transit cars, with wheels, could be routed to where they are needed (of course, many light rail systems are electric...so the cars need to have enough battery to go "off grid" when necessary).  Cross-over tracks?  What a quaint idea.  Huge re-engineering efforts to route trains to a new area?  How about just updating the software?
  • Automated city buses could use the same right of ways as light rail.  Some cities do this already, but many have duplicate infrastructure.
  • Then, automated cars could use the same right of ways, and tuck in behind the trains.  (In a related idea, what if HOV lanes where switched over to support automated cars only?)
  • Then, ultimately, we don't need the trains at all.  Convoys of self-driving cars, available on demand, will arrange themselves into trains, and make effective use of the right of ways.  The NPR segment referenced that 30% of Uber rides in San Francisco begin or end at train stops.  It would be naive to assume that should drive more investment in light rail.
This seems like a straightforward vision.  Yet, cities are continuing to invest huge amounts in laying down rails.  Stranded investment.


Popular posts from this blog

The Fourth R.

Reading, wRiting, aRithmetic, and algoRithms.  My wife and I were just brainstorming about this: how coding should be the next "basic" skill.  Of course, someone was ahead of us and posted this .  It is awesome to see Mozilla Hackasaurus referenced in this article.  It is a small world. In the early days of the printing press, scholars wrote the books; the press was simply used for production (see this article ).  As time went on, "average" people became familiar with the medium, and used it for their own messages.  We are at just that point with the Web.  Software Engineers write the code, and the Web distributes it.   Software Engineers are the algoRithm scholars of today.  They won't be for long.  Soon algoRithms will be taught starting in elementary school, along with the other three R's.
Read more

Connectome as a Book

Your Connectome is a map of your brain.  Every neuron, every synapse. I am only a few pages into Connectome, but was intrigued by a sentence: "Human DNA....has three billion letters....would be a million pages long if printed as a book."  The companion question, "How many pages for the Connectome?" might be answered later in the book, but I thought I would take a shot at it here. Here is the punchline: Your Connectome book is 6.7 million times longer than your DNA book. That human DNA is about a million pages is not too surprising, although it probably is not optimized. According to quora there are between 1500 and 1800 letters per page.  I am going to use round numbers, namely 2000.  Then, the 3x10^9 DNA letters would actually be 1.5 million pages.  But this is very wasteful.  Even using just ASCII we can encode four DNA letters per character, so the book should really only be about 400K pages.  And, this book is much more interesting; in...
Post a Comment
Read more