Skip to main content

Verizon: Throttling and Net Neutrality

There is an interesting dynamic emerging with Verizon's stated intention to throttle their top 5% of users:

Verizon Wireless strives to provide customers the best experience when using our network, a shared resource among tens of millions of customers. To help achieve this, if you use an extraordinary amount of data and fall within the top 5% of Verizon Wireless data users we may reduce your data throughput speeds periodically for the remainder of your then current and immediately following billing cycle to ensure high quality network performance for other users at locations and times of peak demand. Our proactive management of the Verizon Wireless network is designed to ensure that the remaining 95% of data customers aren't negatively affected by the inordinate data consumption of just a few users.


I would expect some push-back on the fact that Verizon will throttle a user for up to two months, even though users are on a monthly plan.  

However, perhaps more interesting, is if this throttle is going to be applied simply based on bandwidth consumption, or if there is another layer of policy.

Will a user consuming paid-for content, for which Verizon may be getting a portion, be penalized in exactly the same was as a bit-torrent user?

There is a second, related question:  What is the actual bandwidth usage that will push you into the 5% range?  The T-Mobile "5 GB" measure is absolute; Verizon's is relative.  If I watch a few sitcom's on my new Verizon iPhone, will I be penalized?  If data usage grows by 10% across the entire network, supposedly the 5% threshold will also rise proportionally?

The announcement raises more questions than it answers.  Of course, Verizon needs to throttle, and this will be an evolving system.  It will be interesting to watch.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Centre Cannot Hold

Some thoughts on decentralization .  With all of the blockchain and Ethereum news, along with the dramatic uptick of ICO's, it is worth building a framework for decentralization.  The linked post makes a start on that.

Acsoi - Land Grab Economics

"Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income" ( Acsoi ), is a measure of what a companies profits would be if they were not spending like crazy to acquire a space:  in GroupOn's case, this would be retailers. To me, using Acsoi as a measure is really an admission that a company has no staying power beyond brand awareness.  So, they need to grab and own as much mindshare as they can, as quickly as they can, to increase the barrier to entry for competitors.  Without intellectual property to help protect them, and with the cost of switching (for a user) being effectively zero, building a global brand, and relying on brand stickiness, is the best way forward. Companies like Amazon that have been effective at this have also built in other "sticky" factors over time: recommendation engines, one-click purchasing, etc.  This increases the cost for the user to switch, and allows the company to stop pouring money into marketing and acquisition costs.  You also buil

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].