Skip to main content

The Future of Facebook

This is an interesting project (link) and it is good to see that it is kickstarted.

The opening video is quite well structured, starting from positive feedback and moving to negative.  I have taken a snapshot of the video at a screen which presages the five areas that will be covered.


There is no doubt that Facebook is (1) a valuable service, and (2) has raised some hackles due to their ownership of users data.

The area from above that most interests me is the "society" sphere, and what a student at Stanford (from the mobisocial lab...sorry, I don't have an exact name) calls the "circle of like."  Facebook provides great value today to users and to websites, and has created a virtuous circle where clicking "like" drives more traffic to Facebook, and more data / information / knowledge to websites.  I highlight this as the circle reinforces two strong user bases, so displacing Facebook is probably harder than even Google imagines.

The main question is: Can Facebook continue to wall-garden personal information, or will doing so create a critical mass of back-lash that ultimately topples them (and gives Google, or someone else, an opening)?   It seems to me that this question is similar to the one Skype faces.  Both have 500M users, and have proprietary systems that encourage walled garden behavior.   Obviously, the scrutiny on Facebook is much higher than on Skype, but both face a similar quandary:  Is the user base loyal and ultimately, more important than the walled garden?  

For Skype, would supporting industry standards top to bottom be a good thing now?  Would users be happier, and more likely to be loyal?  How important is loyalty vs growth when you have a huge user base?

For Facebook, will the current tide of "unease" grow, or is it a short term effect that will simply simmer (but not boil over) due to the value of the Facebook offering?  The current "tide of unease" is something that I sense, rather than have any specific data points around. 

Or, maybe, as rumor has it, the two will join forces?  IMHO that would be a mistake for Facebook.  It would be much more important to focus on search, which creates further virtuous circles, than to invest in voice, which reinforces existing ones.

Regardless, I am looking forward to the analysis of the future-of-facebook.  The team that has been assembled will certainly have opinions to share.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Timed math tests

You have 3.2 seconds to figure out the problem below. Alan knows 90% of the concepts behind the math test, and can do those 90% very quickly.  He always gets 90% on timed math tests. Bob knows 100% of the concepts, but is a slow worker.  In the timed math test, he gets 75%, but, if given an extra 10 minutes, would get 100%. Alan graduates with an A; Bob with a C. You are building a bridge. Who would you hire? Seems like everyone from Gates to Zuckerberg has problems with how education is carried out today.  I wish I had some of their clout and could help to change the system.
Post a Comment
Read more

FTC should look at the Republicrats

It strikes me that the Republicrats (the Democrats and the Republicans) form an unfair monopoly.  While antitrust law is typically associated with corporations, it could, conceivably also be applied to government (the FTC is an independent government body). Triggering the antitrust laws typically means that you have a monopoly (hard to argue against that for the Republicrats) and that you abuse that position.  It has become abundantly clear over the last year that both parties are abusing their positions by focusing all of their energies on "win at any cost" as opposed to "do something for the country."  This is also why they can be considered a single entity (for the purposes of a monopoly)...they are not really two parties; just one inward facing machine. Unfortunately, it appears that there will not be any real third party, yet again, in the next election....so there is no motivation for either party to change their behavior.   It also appears that you ...
Post a Comment
Read more