Skip to main content

Facebook IPO - the new normal?

It used to be that an IPO was:
  1. The first major liquidity event for shareholders
  2. A means to raise growth capital
  3. The first time a company was "market priced" due to (1).
Because private market trading is now so prevalent, even small companies can achieve liquidity early in their lifecycle, with significant trading volume.  This also means that the companies will have fairly accurate market pricing.  If anything, they may be overpriced as the private trading system attracts earlier, higher risk investors.

The secondary markets also provide a means for companies to attract early growth capital...with a lot less hassle than an IPO.  Companies will probably stay on secondary markets until they are more mature, meaning more of the upside value will have been realized before they go public.

This is certainly the case with Facebook.  They are mature, they are profitable, and they raised a lot of their growth capital already.  The IPO (rumored to be raising $10B) is more about establishing a war chest so that they can compete with existing war chests (Google, Microsoft, etc.).  The evolution to the social web has just begun, so this is a smart move.




Popular posts from this blog

The Centre Cannot Hold

Some thoughts on decentralization .  With all of the blockchain and Ethereum news, along with the dramatic uptick of ICO's, it is worth building a framework for decentralization.  The linked post makes a start on that.
Read more

Acsoi - Land Grab Economics

"Adjusted Consolidated Segment Operating Income" ( Acsoi ), is a measure of what a companies profits would be if they were not spending like crazy to acquire a space:  in GroupOn's case, this would be retailers. To me, using Acsoi as a measure is really an admission that a company has no staying power beyond brand awareness.  So, they need to grab and own as much mindshare as they can, as quickly as they can, to increase the barrier to entry for competitors.  Without intellectual property to help protect them, and with the cost of switching (for a user) being effectively zero, building a global brand, and relying on brand stickiness, is the best way forward. Companies like Amazon that have been effective at this have also built in other "sticky" factors over time: recommendation engines, one-click purchasing, etc.  This increases the cost for the user to switch, and allows the company to stop pouring money into marketing and acquisition costs.  You also buil
Post a Comment
Read more

Gliese 581g

So...there is probably intelligent life out there.  As the old Monty Python saying goes, "I hope so, cause there certainly isn't much here on earth."  Case in point.  The video for Gliese581g is on MSNBC, and works fine in IE, but crashes in Chrome [ here ].
Post a Comment
Read more