If this article is accurate, Microsoft is paying Nokia almost $250 for every Windows phone that Nokia ships. The payback, ostensibly, is twofold:
Of course, Google may react and try to shut down, or limit, such a practice.....but operators might endorse it. More Microsoft services, more data usage.
The marketing tradeoff is straightforward: is it easier to get someone to download the Windows 8 App, or to purchase a Nokia phone? With most of the planet sitting in front of a Windows OS, and using a Microsoft browser, they would seem to have a lot of leverage for promoting a software download.
Why won't Microsoft do this? Because it implies that the OS is no longer important (the App would run on Android!).
- Wide enough adoption that Microsoft becomes a player in mobile
- People, through usage, will stick to Microsoft services, and become long term customers.
Of course, Google may react and try to shut down, or limit, such a practice.....but operators might endorse it. More Microsoft services, more data usage.
The marketing tradeoff is straightforward: is it easier to get someone to download the Windows 8 App, or to purchase a Nokia phone? With most of the planet sitting in front of a Windows OS, and using a Microsoft browser, they would seem to have a lot of leverage for promoting a software download.
Why won't Microsoft do this? Because it implies that the OS is no longer important (the App would run on Android!).